Estate Planning

What is Joint Tenancy: Pros and Cons

Many people have the false conception that they will be able to protect their assets if they co-own property. Some of the common ownership types include joint tenancy, tenants in common and tenancy by the entirety.…

Quick navigation

Jump to the section you need

Use these quick links to go straight to the answer, example, or planning point that matters most right now.

  1. Why Joint Tenancy to Avoid Probate and Taxes is Not the Best Asset Protection Plan
  2. Pros and Advantages of Joint Tenancy
  3. Avoiding probate with the joint tenancy
  1. Cons and Drawbacks of Joint Tenancy
  2. Case Scenario of a Joint Tenancy

Many people have the false conception that they will be able to protect their assets if they co-own property. Some of the common ownership types include joint tenancy, tenants in common and tenancy by the entirety. While these can offer some benefits, these methods of ownership will not offer solid asset protection; and actually may make it worse.

 

Why Joint Tenancy to Avoid Probate and Taxes is Not the Best Asset Protection Plan

 

Protect your assets from lawsuits, divorce, Medicaid.Many people think of joint tenancy as a form of asset protection. Families will use a joint tenancy to avoid probate and avoid taxes of their property and real estate. They also will use it to distribute the real estate to their beneficiaries equitably. This form of asset protection may not be wise.
 
Asset protection is an important part of estate planning, but there could be some problems with the ways to own property if you listen to the wrong “expert.” There are a large number of estate planning attorneys that will recommend common ways to title property to incorrectly do asset protection. The problem is that many of these ways can be a disaster when looking at them from the view point of Asset Protection. There are a few ways that clients will typically own property.
 

Pros and Advantages of Joint Tenancy

 

Joint Tenancy This is also referred to as joint tenancy with the rights of survivorship. Owning property as a joint tenancy will allow each joint tenant the same rights, which can include:
 

1. Right of joint tenant to use property

 

The right of the joint tenant to use the property, including with land, the right to occupy the entire property, with bank account money or stocks and the right to spend the entire amount.
 

2. Joint tenant can transfer ownership of property

 

The right to make a transfer of the interest that is in the property without having to receive permission from other co-owners.
 

3. Right of Survivorship in joint tenancy

 

A survival right, for example, when a tenant dies. This means that the share of the tenant that has passed will automatically become an asset of the other co-owners. Basically, this states that a joint tenant cannot transfer the interest at death.
 

Avoiding probate with the joint tenancy

 

The question is why joint tenancy is even used. It happens to be one of the most common forms of ownership for a large variety of assets, including real estate, brokerage accounts and bank accounts. The reason this is a common form of ownership is because when one owner dies, the entire asset will then become the asset of the other owner. The end result is that this is one of the best ways to avoid probate for a particular asset. The following will address why these may not be good in regards to asset protection.
 

Cons and Drawbacks of Joint Tenancy

 

While joint tenancy may sound great at first glance, there are some reasons why it is not the best choice in regards to asset protection, such as:
 

1. Joint tenancy can be served

 

Joint tenancy can be served. This means that is one of the tenants transfers or sells the interest in the property, the joint tenancy will then become a tenancy in common.
 

2. Joint tenancy can be subject to creditors

 

The joint tenancy is an asset of each individual co-owner and can be subject to creditors. If either owner were to be sued and lost the court case, the creditor could receive the interest in the entire property. This will destroy the joint tenancy and could also result in the entire property being sold in order to satisfy the debt.
 

Case Scenario of a Joint Tenancy

 

Example: Let’s say that Doctor Johnson owns some property that has a worth of $1 million and he owns it as joint tenants with a sibling.
 
The doctor is then sued for malpractice and the final judgment against him totals $3 million. He only has $1 million in malpractice insurance. The creditor can then proceed in asking the court to force the sale of the property that is owned with the doctor’s sibling. The creditor could also ask that the interest in the property be transferred directly to the creditor. Either of these transactions will have consequences. Basically, the bottom line is that any asset that is owned by joint tenancy will be subject to creditors of multiple people.
 

3. Whoever lives the longest wins in a joint tenancy

 

Joint tenancy is nothing more than a gamble. Basically, whichever co-owner lives the longest will end up with all of the assets. Generally, this is not the intent when the joint tenancy is established. In fact, many people who have this type of ownership do not even realize the potential problems that could arise. This is often the case when parents are trying to avoid probate and taxes on property and have the desire to give an equal share of the property to any children.
 
 
Based on these possible problems, it is suggested to avoid joint tenancy as a means of asset protection.
 
 

Related resources

After reading What is Joint Tenancy: Pros and Cons, most readers want a clearer next step: which structure answers the same problem, what timing changes the result, and where the practical follow-up questions usually lead.

What people compare next

The next question is usually not abstract. It is whether a trust, an entity, or a different planning step does the real job better in your situation.

What often changes the answer

Timing, ownership, funding, and how much control you want to keep usually matter more than labels alone.

When a conversation helps more

Once structure, timing, and next steps start intersecting, it usually helps to talk through the options in the right order.

Explore Asset Protection Trust

See how trust-based planning is used to protect wealth, organize control, and support long-term decisions.

Explore Irrevocable Trust

Understand how irrevocable trust planning works, when people use it, and what tradeoffs usually matter most.

Explore How It Works

Follow the planning process from consultation through drafting, funding, and the next practical steps.

Explore Ebook

Download the guide for a longer walkthrough you can read at your own pace and revisit later.

Explore Main Blog

Browse more practical articles, comparisons, and next-step guidance across the full UltraTrust blog.

Explore Contact

Reach out when you want to talk through timing, structure, and the next steps that best fit your situation.

What people usually compare next

Most readers compare structure, timing, control, and the practical next step after narrowing the issue in the article above.

What usually makes the answer more specific

Actual ownership, funding, current exposure, and how much control someone wants to keep usually matter more than labels in isolation.

When another step helps more than another article

Once timing, structure, and next steps start overlapping, it often helps to talk through the sequence instead of trying to compare everything mentally.

Questions readers usually ask next

Clear answers make it easier to compare structure, timing, control, and the next step that fits best.

What usually matters most before moving ahead with a trust-based protection plan?

Most people get the clearest answer by looking at timing, current ownership, funding, and how much control they want to keep. Those points usually shape the next step more than labels alone.

How do readers usually decide which related page to read next?

Most readers move next to the page that answers the practical question left open after the article, whether that is lawsuit exposure, business-owner risk, trust structure, cost, or how the process works.

When does it help to compare more than one structure instead of stopping with one article?

It usually helps as soon as the decision involves more than one concern at the same time, such as protection, control, taxes, family planning, or business exposure. That is when side-by-side comparison becomes more useful than reading in isolation.

What makes the next step feel more practical and less theoretical?

The next step feels more practical once the discussion turns to actual assets, ownership, timing, and the sequence of decisions that would need to happen in real life.

Ready to take the next step?

Get clear guidance on trust structure, planning priorities, and the next move that fits your assets and goals.