Asset Protection

Legal nightmares: Asset Protection Strategies

Everyone has either experienced or know of someone who went through a financial nightmare:   The frivolous lawsuit   Fueling these frivolous lawsuits are contingent fee lawyers. Quite simply, a contingent fee lawyer is yo…

Quick navigation

Jump to the section you need

Use these quick links to go straight to the answer, example, or planning point that matters most right now.

  1. The frivolous lawsuit
  2. An Irresponsible or Problematic Business Partner
  3. The Slip and Fall
  4. Irresponsible or Unruly Children
  1. The First Children and the Second Divorce
  2. What is the best asset protection solution?
  3. What readers usually compare next
Everyone has either experienced or know of someone who went through a financial nightmare:
 

The frivolous lawsuit

 
Fueling these frivolous lawsuits are contingent fee lawyers. Quite simply, a contingent fee lawyer is your financial nightmare. Your assets can evaporate before your very eyes. His objective is to squeeze all he can out of you. Right, wrong – it does not matter. When he goes in front of a judge he will do and say anything to intimidate you to settle. Most likely, you will be intimidated and you will settle, because either way it’s going to cost you.

An Irresponsible or Problematic Business Partner

You are in business. Your partner has become problematic. You fear the obvious.
 
Partners are jointly and severally liable for all legal and financial obligations of the partnership and for all wrongful acts of any partner acting in the ordinary course of partnership business.
 

The Slip and Fall

You are a young doctor with a young family, you just started your own practice. What if? Employees, patients, slip and fall,…but you carry liability insurance, you say.
 
Liability insurers have two (or three, in some jurisdictions) major duties:
1) the duty to defend,
2) the duty to indemnify, and (in some jurisdictions),
3) the duty to settle a reasonably clear claim.
After the initial defense, the insurer has three options, to:
(1) seek a declaratory judgment of no coverage;
(2) defend; or
(3) refuse either to defend or to seek a declaratory judgment.
 

Irresponsible or Unruly Children

Your under-age children are irresponsible, uncontrollable, in and out of trouble with the law.
 
A person who is responsible for the death of another may be liable under civil law, criminal law, or both. In the civil liability context, the basis of which is tort law, parental liability for the acts of minor children takes two forms: vicarious tort liability and, parental responsibility statutes hold parents criminally liable when their children commit acts of juvenile delinquency.
 
What if you go away for a weekend? You tell your under age kids that you and Mom will take the weekend to some not too distant site, you’re leaving Friday afternoon and returning late Sunday night. You instruct your kids: no friends at the house, no drinking, no partying. You will call to check-in, here’s the number where we will be, and of course we will have our cell phone.
 
Parental civil liability is imposed by most states, by statute when children are not, or cannot be, financially responsible.
 
See ARIz. REv. STAT. § 12-661 (1999) (“any act of malicious or willful misconduct of a minor…shall be imputed to the parents or legal guardian having custody or control…”); CAL. CIV. CODE § 1714.1 (Deering 1999) (“Any act of willful misconduct of a minor…shall be imputed to the parent or guardian having custody or control .. . “); ILL. CaMP. STAT. ANN. 740 115/1 (West 1999) (“The legislative purpose of this Act is…to compensate innocent victims of juvenile misconduct that is willful or mali-cious; and…to place upon the parents the obligation to control a minor child…”); N.Y. GEN. OBLIG. LAw § :3-112 (McKinney 1999) (”The parent or legal guardian, other than the state, a local sodal services department or a foster parent, of an infant over ten and less than eighteen years of age, shall be liable…where such infant has willfully, maliciously, or unlawfully damaged…”); TEx. FAM. CODE ANN. § 41.001 (West 1999) (“A parent or other person who has the duty to control…the negligent conduct of the child if the conduct is reasonably attributable to the negligent failure of the parent…or…the willful and malicious conduct of a child who is at least 12 years of age but under 18 years of age. “)
 
source:
 

The First Children and the Second Divorce

 

You’re in a rocky second marriage. You are constantly putting out fires. You are waiting for her to take half and wondering if your child from your first marriage will get anything.
 

What is the best asset protection solution?

 

Do any of these, sound familiar?
 
Protecting your assets from a frivolous lawsuit or any other contingent fee professional can only be accomplished through a timely implementation of an “irrevocable Trust, with an independent Trustee” Period. For added protection you elect to have an “independent Trust Protector.”
 
Most people, like you, procrastinate. They know the risk but fall short on implementation. Sound familiar? You will not act until it’s too late.
 
Fraudulent conveyance” is the primary risk when you try to move assets in a crisis situation. It’s too late, says your lawyer. A judge will undo any of your planning, and your lawyers will unlikely help you because he will become a civil conspirator and possibly lose his license to practice.
 
Is your lawyer, right? Can he lose his license? It depends on the circumstances.
 
The critical part not taught in school, is avoidance of the fraudulent conveyance claims by potential past, present, and future (not yet born) creditors.
 
What they overlooked was that the movement/repositioning of any assets…relies on the theory of a “fair” “exchange.” You give me $100 I give you back $100, that’s the “exchange.”
 
I perfected the “method of exchange” to AVOID fraudulent conveyance, civil conspiracy, avoiding the trigger of income taxes, resulting in the elimination of probate, elimination of estate taxes, elimination of Medicaid and state recovery of Medicaid, avoidance of the Generation Skipping Tax, Tax deferral and tax-free wealth accumulation, reduction of frivolous lawsuits, eliminate ex-spouses, your business partners, greedy and clever lawyers with their contingent-fee clients, and put monkey wrenches into the legal system to make them spend money. Finally: dictate from your grave the distribution of your assets. …. Oh, YES. It’s been tested.
 
When our Ultra Trust® is combined with the method of exchange, it’s the best you can do without having to go offshore.

Helpful resources: Many readers also review Asset Protection Trust, Revocable vs Irrevocable Trust, and official IRS estate and gift tax guidance when comparing planning options.

What readers usually compare next

Readers looking at Legal nightmares: Asset Protection Strategies usually compare timing, control, and exposure before deciding what to do next.

Three practical points to keep in mind

  • Timing matters because planning choices usually become narrower once a problem is already close.
  • Control matters because the answer often depends on how much access or authority the owner wants to keep.
  • Funding matters because a trust or entity has to be set up and maintained correctly to matter.

Helpful next steps

Readers often continue with Asset Protection Trust, Irrevocable Trust, and How It Works. When the question turns from reading to implementation, many readers move from these guides to a direct planning conversation.

Related resources

After reading Legal nightmares: Asset Protection Strategies, most readers want a clearer next step: which structure answers the same problem, what timing changes the result, and where the practical follow-up questions usually lead.

What people compare next

The next question is usually not abstract. It is whether a trust, an entity, or a different planning step does the real job better in your situation.

What often changes the answer

Timing, ownership, funding, and how much control you want to keep usually matter more than labels alone.

When a conversation helps more

Once structure, timing, and next steps start intersecting, it usually helps to talk through the options in the right order.

Explore Asset Protection

Review the main introduction to asset protection planning and the core decisions that shape a stronger structure.

Explore Asset Protection Trust

See how trust-based planning is used to protect wealth, organize control, and support long-term decisions.

Explore Irrevocable Trust

Understand how irrevocable trust planning works, when people use it, and what tradeoffs usually matter most.

Explore How It Works

Follow the planning process from consultation through drafting, funding, and the next practical steps.

Explore Ebook

Download the guide for a longer walkthrough you can read at your own pace and revisit later.

Explore Main Blog

Browse more practical articles, comparisons, and next-step guidance across the full UltraTrust blog.

What people usually compare next

Most readers compare structure, timing, control, and the practical next step after narrowing the issue in the article above.

What usually makes the answer more specific

Actual ownership, funding, current exposure, and how much control someone wants to keep usually matter more than labels in isolation.

When another step helps more than another article

Once timing, structure, and next steps start overlapping, it often helps to talk through the sequence instead of trying to compare everything mentally.

Questions readers usually ask next

Clear answers make it easier to compare structure, timing, control, and the next step that fits best.

What usually matters most before moving ahead with a trust-based protection plan?

Most people get the clearest answer by looking at timing, current ownership, funding, and how much control they want to keep. Those points usually shape the next step more than labels alone.

How do readers usually decide which related page to read next?

Most readers move next to the page that answers the practical question left open after the article, whether that is lawsuit exposure, business-owner risk, trust structure, cost, or how the process works.

When does it help to compare more than one structure instead of stopping with one article?

It usually helps as soon as the decision involves more than one concern at the same time, such as protection, control, taxes, family planning, or business exposure. That is when side-by-side comparison becomes more useful than reading in isolation.

What makes the next step feel more practical and less theoretical?

The next step feels more practical once the discussion turns to actual assets, ownership, timing, and the sequence of decisions that would need to happen in real life.

Ready to take the next step?

Get clear guidance on trust structure, planning priorities, and the next move that fits your assets and goals.